Difference between revisions of "User talk:Startreknerd11011011"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I think this part: the main problem was that enterprise could not have existed, the enterprise-D was refered to as the 5th ship to carry the name enterprise, 1) enterprise (entire of ori...) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 13:37, 6 October 2008
I think this part:
the main problem was that enterprise could not have existed, the enterprise-D was refered to as the 5th ship to carry the name enterprise,
1) enterprise (entire of original series & animated series)
2) enterprise-A (end of star trek 4 and entire of star trek 5 & 6)
3) enterprise-B (start of generations)
4) enterprise-C (one episode of The Next Generation [Yesterdays enterprise])
5) enterprise-D (entire of The Next generation and entire of Generations.)
it was as bad an idea as resident evil zero
would be better in the main Star Trek: Enterprise article -- perhaps as an addenda to the "Continuity? What Continuity?" section.
--DreadPirateRobert 13:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)