Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sapience"

From Imperial Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
question:  what's the relationship between sapience and [[artificial intelligence]]? --[[User:DreadPirateRobert]]
question:  what's the relationship between sapience and [[artificial intelligence]]? --[[User:DreadPirateRobert]]
* I would venture that ''intelligence'' is the capacity to learn, while ''sapience'' is the ability to independently act on acquired knowledge (self-motivation). --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 19:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
* I would venture that ''intelligence'' is the capacity to learn, while ''sapience'' is the ability to independently act on acquired knowledge (self-motivation). --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 19:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
** Okay, so Data and C-3PO would be sapient, while Daystrom's M5 computer would merely be AI?
*** It would probably be sapient.  Having ''bad'' judgement is still having judgement, and it did independently decide to exceed the parameters of its combat simulation. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 20:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
**** That's right, it did.  [[User:DreadPirateRobert|DreadPirateRobert]] 20:44, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:44, 5 August 2008

question: what's the relationship between sapience and artificial intelligence? --User:DreadPirateRobert

  • I would venture that intelligence is the capacity to learn, while sapience is the ability to independently act on acquired knowledge (self-motivation). --Ted C 19:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
    • Okay, so Data and C-3PO would be sapient, while Daystrom's M5 computer would merely be AI?
      • It would probably be sapient. Having bad judgement is still having judgement, and it did independently decide to exceed the parameters of its combat simulation. --Ted C 20:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)