Talk:Imperial Star Destroyer

From Imperial Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Has anyone uploaded any ISD images yet? I'm planning on cribbing some from the main site. PS Tribun, should I add this to the SW starships category? --Stark 15:55, 8 November 2007 (EST)

  • I went ahead and added this to the SW Starships category, since the Imperial-class page isn't exactly talking about only one starship either. Also added some notes on naming from some novels. - Mad 16:10, 8 November 2007 (EST)
    • Thanks. I was going to split the existing I-class SD page, but thought it'd be better to create the 'general' page that links to it first, then make an I-class page specifically for that class. ST seems to have many people contributing already, so I think I'll concentrate on SW stuff for now. --Stark 16:19, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Thanks, Ruinus. I don't know shit about the Tector. ## wait, did you just copy that verbatim out of Wookiepedia? Lame. --Stark 20:12, 8 November 2007 (EST)

? Fucking crap, I was trying to make it sound different, but I must be distracted because it sounds alot like what is on there. How to make it sound different? --Darth Ruinus 5:14 PM November 8, 2007 (Pacific Time)

  • Read the source, think about the ideas, then re-write it in your own words. Like in highschool. :) I just went to wookie to see if 'Tector' was supposed to be an 'Allegiance', and the version you posted here is almost 100% the same, which is bad. Don't feel too bad, I just realised I confused fucking Acclamators with Allegiances. --Stark 20:19, 8 November 2007 (EST)
  • Better? Should I change it, I mean, I stated all the important parts, but it keeps sounding like the Wookieepedia article. EDIT: BTW, the Allegiance class is a Super Star Destroyer, so, should that be put in with Star Destroyer, or a whole different category altogether? And all searched for the Dominator come up telling me that the Dominator is a name for a Victory and an Interdictor class, not a class in its own right, help? --Darth Ruinus 5:40 PM 11-08-07 (Pacific Time)
  • It's better, but don't feel that you need to cut bits out. The parts from the design elements section are mostly fron SDN and SWTC, but I've rephrased them and broken them up a different way so it's not so obvious. Then again, there isn't really much info on Tector, so maybe small isn't a problem. Allegiance's are 2.2kms, apparently, so they're just oversized destroyers, not even really Star Cruisers. They can 'super' name them all they want, stupid Dark Empire, they're destroyers. :) The smaller, 'Victory-based' Interdictor isn't the same as the full-size one (which apparently only has one example, the smaller one being more common). This ain't no Victory. --Stark 20:53, 8 November 2007 (EST)
  • I know thats not a Victory, but looking up Dominator yielded this: And any other searches into this Dominator class only point to Dominator being used as a name, rather than being a class. But then again, I am suffereing from sleep deprivation, with lots of homework on the side and shit, I am probably just reading your responses wrong. --Darth Ruinus 6:14 PM 11-08-07 (Pacific Time)
    • No, you're right: there's no proper class name because there's only been like three of them in the comics. Maybe I should put something down for 'provisional class names' or something, which would have to include the Allegiance too. --Stark 21:25, 8 November 2007 (EST)
  • Where did the info on the Dominator apppear from? I have never heard of these ships. --Darth Ruinus 12:39 PM 11-09-07 (Pacific Time)