Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hodgkin's Law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* No, but there is a Stupidity category and a Star Trek category, both of which could be applied. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 15:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | * No, but there is a Stupidity category and a Star Trek category, both of which could be applied. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 15:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
** Aha! Thanks. Sorry about forgetting to add the ST category! --[[User:DreadPirateRobert|DreadPirateRobert]] 16:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:15, 5 September 2008
Is there a category for "stupid, but canon?"
This would look nice next to human/vulcans, midichorians, and karen traviss. --DreadPirateRobert 13:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- No, but there is a Stupidity category and a Star Trek category, both of which could be applied. --Ted C 15:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Aha! Thanks. Sorry about forgetting to add the ST category! --DreadPirateRobert 16:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)