Difference between revisions of "The Alderaan Argument"

From Imperial Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Some rewording and grammar corrections.)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Alderaan Argument is an attempt to argue that the Death Star did not directly destroy Alderaan, and that it simply catalyzed something in/on the planet to have it destroy itself (That is, a Chain reaction rather than direct energy transfer). This is often used as an attempt to de-value the actual destructive power of the Death Star. Many variants of this theory call for the gravitational bind ([[http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Intro/gravity.html GBE]]) of the planet to be ignored.
The Alderaan Argument refers to the debate on how the [[Death Star]] destroyed [[Alderaan]].
 
Some attempt to argue that the Death Star did not directly destroy Alderaan, and that it instead catalyzed something in/on the planet to have it destroy itself (that is, some kind of mysterious chain reaction rather than direct energy transfer). This is often used as an attempt to devalue the actual destructive power of the Death Star. Many variants of this theory call for the [http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Intro/gravity.html gravitational binding energy] of the planet to be ignored.


[[Category:Debate]]
[[Category:Debate]]

Revision as of 18:50, 6 November 2007

The Alderaan Argument refers to the debate on how the Death Star destroyed Alderaan.

Some attempt to argue that the Death Star did not directly destroy Alderaan, and that it instead catalyzed something in/on the planet to have it destroy itself (that is, some kind of mysterious chain reaction rather than direct energy transfer). This is often used as an attempt to devalue the actual destructive power of the Death Star. Many variants of this theory call for the gravitational binding energy of the planet to be ignored.