Difference between revisions of "The Alderaan Argument"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The Alderaan Argument is an attempt to argue that the Death Star did not directly destroy Alderaan, and that it simply catalyzed something in/on the planet to have it destroy itself (That is, a Chain reaction rather than direct energy transfer). This is often used as an attempt to de-value the actual destructive power of the Death Star. Many variants of this theory call for the gravitational bind ([[http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Intro/gravity.html GBE]]) of the planet to be ignored. | The Alderaan Argument is an attempt to argue that the Death Star did not directly destroy Alderaan, and that it simply catalyzed something in/on the planet to have it destroy itself (That is, a Chain reaction rather than direct energy transfer). This is often used as an attempt to de-value the actual destructive power of the Death Star. Many variants of this theory call for the gravitational bind ([[http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Intro/gravity.html GBE]]) of the planet to be ignored. | ||
[[Category:Debate]] | |||
Revision as of 18:42, 6 November 2007
The Alderaan Argument is an attempt to argue that the Death Star did not directly destroy Alderaan, and that it simply catalyzed something in/on the planet to have it destroy itself (That is, a Chain reaction rather than direct energy transfer). This is often used as an attempt to de-value the actual destructive power of the Death Star. Many variants of this theory call for the gravitational bind ([GBE]) of the planet to be ignored.