Difference between revisions of "Talk:TIE fighter"

From Imperial Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 10: Line 10:


Added a couple of general descriptions for some entries. I don't really know how much info is wanted for each entry so the ones there now could act as placeholders or something?[[User:Wild Karrde|Wild Karrde]] 18:00, 8 November 2007 (EST)
Added a couple of general descriptions for some entries. I don't really know how much info is wanted for each entry so the ones there now could act as placeholders or something?[[User:Wild Karrde|Wild Karrde]] 18:00, 8 November 2007 (EST)
*Um, that -was- a link to SWTC?  Either way. :)  And yeah, don't worry too much about polish or huge amounts of content yet. --[[User:Stark|Stark]] 18:03, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 23:03, 8 November 2007

Karrde, do you want to make a central 'TIE Fighter' page that links to all the sub-variants? I'm doing the same thing with a main 'ISD' page atm. --Stark 16:33, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Sounds like a good idea. Wild Karrde 16:35, 8 November 2007 (EST)

    • Er, I was suggesting you create a new 'TIE fighter' page, then use it to link to your already extant 'TIE/fc' page. I hope I wasn't unclear, and you just figure a whole page per variant was excessive (which it probably is). :# Anyway, SWTC has great info on TIE fighters, variants, and EU apperances, so I'd recommend you go have a look. --Stark 16:39, 8 November 2007 (EST)

I thought you meant a single page with a list of TIE fighter varients? I'm still rather new at this... Wild Karrde 16:45, 8 November 2007 (EST)

  • Well, it's a wiki, we can always clean up the format later: adding content is important, so keep up the good work. :) --Stark 16:58, 8 November 2007 (EST)

I assume that link you posted in the article was meant to go here :p. Anyway I'm looking at the swtc for the info now but thanks anyway.Wild Karrde 17:15, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Added a couple of general descriptions for some entries. I don't really know how much info is wanted for each entry so the ones there now could act as placeholders or something?Wild Karrde 18:00, 8 November 2007 (EST)

  • Um, that -was- a link to SWTC? Either way. :) And yeah, don't worry too much about polish or huge amounts of content yet. --Stark 18:03, 8 November 2007 (EST)