Talk:Star Trek

From Imperial Wiki
Revision as of 13:35, 6 October 2008 by DreadPirateRobert (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"Weakest in this context"? Now that's just being an assholish Warsy (Without a good excuse). There are far worse, or sources that lack quantification or stuff like B5, etc'.--The .303 Bookworm 02:30, 8 November 2007 (EST)

I think this part:

the main problem was that enterprise could not have existed, the enterprise-D was refered to as the 5th ship to carry the name enterprise,

1) enterprise (entire of original series & animated series)

2) enterprise-A (end of star trek 4 and entire of star trek 5 & 6)

3) enterprise-B (start of generations)

4) enterprise-C (one episode of The Next Generation [Yesterdays enterprise])

5) enterprise-D (entire of The Next generation and entire of Generations.)

it was as bad an idea as resident evil zero

would be better in the main Star Trek: Enterprise article -- perhaps as an addenda to the "Continuity? What Continuity?" section.

--DreadPirateRobert 13:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)