Difference between revisions of "Talk:Star Trek"

From Imperial Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: "Weakest in this context"? Now that's just being an assholish Warsy (Without a good excuse). There are far worse, or sources that lack quantification or stuff like B5, etc'.--~~~~)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
"Weakest in this context"? Now that's just being an assholish Warsy (Without a good excuse). There are far worse, or sources that lack quantification or stuff like B5, etc'.--[[User:The .303 Bookworm|The .303 Bookworm]] 02:30, 8 November 2007 (EST)
"Weakest in this context"? Now that's just being an assholish Warsy (Without a good excuse). There are far worse, or sources that lack quantification or stuff like B5, etc'.--[[User:The .303 Bookworm|The .303 Bookworm]] 02:30, 8 November 2007 (EST)
----
I think this part:
the main problem was that enterprise could not have existed, the enterprise-D was refered to as the 5th ship to carry the name enterprise,
1) enterprise (entire of original series & animated series)
2) enterprise-A (end of star trek 4 and entire of star trek 5 & 6)
3) enterprise-B (start of generations)
4) enterprise-C (one episode of The Next Generation [Yesterdays enterprise])
5) enterprise-D (entire of The Next generation and entire of Generations.)
it was as bad an idea as resident evil zero
would be better in the main [[Star Trek: Enterprise]] article -- perhaps as an addenda to the "Continuity? What Continuity?" section.
--[[User:DreadPirateRobert|DreadPirateRobert]] 13:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:35, 6 October 2008

"Weakest in this context"? Now that's just being an assholish Warsy (Without a good excuse). There are far worse, or sources that lack quantification or stuff like B5, etc'.--The .303 Bookworm 02:30, 8 November 2007 (EST)



I think this part:

the main problem was that enterprise could not have existed, the enterprise-D was refered to as the 5th ship to carry the name enterprise,

1) enterprise (entire of original series & animated series)

2) enterprise-A (end of star trek 4 and entire of star trek 5 & 6)

3) enterprise-B (start of generations)

4) enterprise-C (one episode of The Next Generation [Yesterdays enterprise])

5) enterprise-D (entire of The Next generation and entire of Generations.)

it was as bad an idea as resident evil zero

would be better in the main Star Trek: Enterprise article -- perhaps as an addenda to the "Continuity? What Continuity?" section.

--DreadPirateRobert 13:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)