Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shields"

From Imperial Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
("force field" is the correct spelling)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
* We'll need separate articles for Star Wars shield technology and Star Trek shield technology. An article with just the name "Shields" should reference both specific articles. - [[User:Mad|Mad]] 22:17, 6 November 2007 (EST)
 
* We'll need separate articles for Star Wars shield technology and Star Trek shield technology. An article with just the name "Shields" should reference both specific articles. - [[User:Mad|Mad]] 22:17, 6 November 2007 (EST)
 
**Absolutely: ideally someone could compress the general principles from the main site (http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tech/Shields/index.html) and link the factional specific articles (descriptions/capabities) from here. --[[User:Stark|Stark]] 18:45, 7 November 2007 (EST)
 
**Absolutely: ideally someone could compress the general principles from the main site (http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tech/Shields/index.html) and link the factional specific articles (descriptions/capabities) from here. --[[User:Stark|Stark]] 18:45, 7 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
== "Force Field" vs "Forcefield" ==
 +
: "Force field" is the correct spelling. Or, at least, it's much more popular.

Revision as of 16:28, 8 February 2008

Article Naming

  • We'll need separate articles for Star Wars shield technology and Star Trek shield technology. An article with just the name "Shields" should reference both specific articles. - Mad 22:17, 6 November 2007 (EST)

"Force Field" vs "Forcefield"

"Force field" is the correct spelling. Or, at least, it's much more popular.