Difference between revisions of "Talk:Imperial-class Star Destroyer"

From Imperial Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
==Class name==
==Class name==
Isn't "Imperial-class" an artifact of West End Games?  It was always my impression that "Imperial" was simply an adjective that identified the vessel's ownership, not its class.  After [[ROTS]], '''all''' Star Destroyers are '''Imperial''' Star Destroyers, whether they're Venator-class, Victory-class, Imperator-class, or Executor-class. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 10:15, 7 November 2007 (EST)
Isn't "Imperial-class" an artifact of West End Games?  It was always my impression that "Imperial" was simply an adjective that identified the vessel's ownership, not its class.  After [[ROTS]], '''all''' Star Destroyers are '''Imperial''' Star Destroyers, whether they're Venator-class, Victory-class, Imperator-class, or Executor-class. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 10:15, 7 November 2007 (EST)
The Imperator being the class name with imperial justa  description was my impression as well... Any confirmation from ICS?

Revision as of 15:59, 7 November 2007

Wait, where does this 46,000 personnel number come from?

It sounds damiliar, wasn' it in the ICS? I'll confirm when I get home later. The extra numbers for flagships sounds suspiciously made up/invented

Class name

Isn't "Imperial-class" an artifact of West End Games? It was always my impression that "Imperial" was simply an adjective that identified the vessel's ownership, not its class. After ROTS, all Star Destroyers are Imperial Star Destroyers, whether they're Venator-class, Victory-class, Imperator-class, or Executor-class. --Ted C 10:15, 7 November 2007 (EST)

The Imperator being the class name with imperial justa description was my impression as well... Any confirmation from ICS?