Difference between revisions of "Talk:Battleship"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
@Isolder74: As I recall, ''HMS Hood'' was a battlecruiser, not a battleship. | @Isolder74: As I recall, ''HMS Hood'' was a battlecruiser, not a battleship. | ||
*Yes, I think she was. However the ship was the largest vessel in the Royal Navy and other then lacking sufficient deck armor was more or less a fast battleship in all but name. --[[User:Isolder74|Isolder74]] 23:32, 22 March 2013 (EDT) | *Yes, I think she was. However the ship was the largest vessel in the Royal Navy and other then lacking sufficient deck armor was more or less a fast battleship in all but name. --[[User:Isolder74|Isolder74]] 23:32, 22 March 2013 (EDT) | ||
*''HMS Hood'' was designed as a battlecruiser, but she was refitted to have the armor of a full battleship. Unfortunately, the upgrade was not completed on the aft deck before she met the ''Bismarck'' in battle. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] ([[User talk:Ted C|talk]]) 19:25, 7 November 2019 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:25, 8 November 2019
@Isolder74: As I recall, HMS Hood was a battlecruiser, not a battleship.
- Yes, I think she was. However the ship was the largest vessel in the Royal Navy and other then lacking sufficient deck armor was more or less a fast battleship in all but name. --Isolder74 23:32, 22 March 2013 (EDT)
- HMS Hood was designed as a battlecruiser, but she was refitted to have the armor of a full battleship. Unfortunately, the upgrade was not completed on the aft deck before she met the Bismarck in battle. --Ted C (talk) 19:25, 7 November 2019 (EST)