Talk:All-Terrain Armored Transport

From Imperial Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Can I put my original "Design" section back in the article? --Coiler1 23:30, 1 March 2008 (EST)

  • Assuming it's a well-reasoned analysis and not a rant, yes. Not that yours was, IIRC. --Ted C 11:31, 2 March 2008 (EST)

I put it back and made some revisions to try to make it fair. Hope it's ok. --Coiler1 13:55, 2 March 2008 (EST)

  • I tweaked it a bit. As I recall, the tripping attack worked exactly once; the second attempted resulted in Luke's speeder being shot down. Further, the Rebels were just lucky to have those cable attachments on their speeders; I would hardly expect them to have been planning to repel an AT-AT attack with them. They have a huge profile, but they also seem to have the armor to withstand anything their enemies are likely to throw at them, and putting their weapons up high gives them greater range. Overall, it seems to be a pretty successful design for handling in-universe opponents. --Ted C 19:52, 2 March 2008 (EST)

Based on Rogue One, it seems that the weapons mounted on starfighter like X-Wings and Y-Wings are sufficient to damage an AT-AT (or possibly a less-armored variant). Since such weapons are also sufficient to damage capital warships, I guess that's reasonable. --Ted C (talk) 14:06, 9 June 2020 (EDT)