Difference between revisions of "One-post wonder"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||
[http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=119607 Masonwheeler] thought he could refute [[Mike Wong|Mike Wong's]] article on the [http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/Trek-Marxism.html economics of Star Trek] by pointing out that the [[Federation]] has [[replicator]]s. He had nothing to say when several board members refuted his argument with ease. | *[http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=119607 Masonwheeler] thought he could refute [[Mike Wong|Mike Wong's]] article on the [http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/Trek-Marxism.html economics of Star Trek] by pointing out that the [[Federation]] has [[replicator]]s. He had nothing to say when several board members refuted his argument with ease. | ||
* [http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=119627&highlight= Econfan] thought he could pass himself off as a university professor and school everyone on global warming, but failed to respond when challenged to prove his credentials. | |||
[[Category: SDN Culture]] | [[Category: SDN Culture]] | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 7 March 2008
A one-post wonder is a BBS user who registers to make exactly one post before disappearing. They typically think they have a new and devastating argument on a particular topic, but in reality their argument has almost always been refuted many times before. Presumably they're too ashamed to show themselves again after witnessing their "devastating" arguments get a righteous digital ass-kicking.
Examples
- Masonwheeler thought he could refute Mike Wong's article on the economics of Star Trek by pointing out that the Federation has replicators. He had nothing to say when several board members refuted his argument with ease.
- Econfan thought he could pass himself off as a university professor and school everyone on global warming, but failed to respond when challenged to prove his credentials.