Difference between revisions of "Category talk:ST Starships"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Would it perhaps be a good idea to draw up a template for "starship" articles and stick to it? Right now everyone seems to use their own system and it makes this category look very disjoin...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would it perhaps be a good idea to draw up a template for "starship" articles and stick to it? Right now everyone seems to use their own system and it makes this category look very disjointed. | Would it perhaps be a good idea to draw up a template for "starship" articles and stick to it? Right now everyone seems to use their own system and it makes this category look very disjointed. | ||
--[[User:Bounty|Bounty]] 07:57, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | --[[User:Bounty|Bounty]] 07:57, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
* It would certainly be a good thing. That of course requires us to agree on a format or have someone in authority decide on one, then we'll have to go through and get them all updated. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 08:34, 21 March 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:34, 21 March 2008
Would it perhaps be a good idea to draw up a template for "starship" articles and stick to it? Right now everyone seems to use their own system and it makes this category look very disjointed. --Bounty 07:57, 21 March 2008 (EDT)
- It would certainly be a good thing. That of course requires us to agree on a format or have someone in authority decide on one, then we'll have to go through and get them all updated. --Ted C 08:34, 21 March 2008 (EDT)