Talk:Imperial Star Destroyer

From ImperialWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
*Better? Should I change it, I mean, I stated all the important parts, but it keeps sounding like the Wookieepedia article. EDIT: BTW, the Allegiance class is a Super Star Destroyer, so, should that be put in with Star Destroyer, or a whole different category altogether? And all searched for the Dominator come up telling me that the Dominator is a name for a Victory and an Interdictor class, not a class in its own right, help? --[[Darth Ruinus]] 5:40 PM 11-08-07 (Pacific Time)
 
*Better? Should I change it, I mean, I stated all the important parts, but it keeps sounding like the Wookieepedia article. EDIT: BTW, the Allegiance class is a Super Star Destroyer, so, should that be put in with Star Destroyer, or a whole different category altogether? And all searched for the Dominator come up telling me that the Dominator is a name for a Victory and an Interdictor class, not a class in its own right, help? --[[Darth Ruinus]] 5:40 PM 11-08-07 (Pacific Time)
 +
 +
**It's better, but don't feel that you need to cut bits out. The parts from the design elements section are mostly fron SDN and SWTC, but I've rephrased them and broken them up a different way so it's not so obvious. Then again, there isn't really much info on Tector, so maybe small isn't a problem. Allegiance's are 2.2kms, apparently, so they're just oversized destroyers, not even really Star Cruisers. They can 'super' name them all they want, stupid Dark Empire, they're destroyers. :) The smaller, 'Victory-based' Interdictor isn't the same as the full-size one (which apparently only has one example, the smaller one being more common).  This http://www.theforce.net/swtc/Pix/comics/xwing/xwtpa6.jpg ain't no Victory.  --[[User:Stark|Stark]] 20:53, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 01:53, 9 November 2007

Personal tools